{"id":7799,"date":"2010-11-17T12:00:05","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T20:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/?p=7799"},"modified":"2010-11-13T22:45:37","modified_gmt":"2010-11-14T06:45:37","slug":"statuesque-michael-douglas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/statuesque-michael-douglas\/","title":{"rendered":"Statuesque: The Douglas Decision (And Why It Doesn&#8217;t Really Matter)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/10\/21\/movies\/21douglas.html?_r=2&amp;hpw\">&#8216;New York Times&#8217; article<\/a> about Michael Douglas, his health troubles, and the dual Oscar campaigns of two of his films (the very good &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/3637\/solitaryman.html\">Solitary Man<\/a>&#8216; and the less-good-but-still-pretty-good &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wall-street-2-review\/\">Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps<\/a>&#8216;) left me puzzled and a little bit sad. As wonderful as his turns in both of those films are (in &#8216;Solitary Man&#8217; particularly), I can easily see him picking up nominations in both the Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor categories. But it seems to be all for nothing. Honestly, he doesn&#8217;t stand a chance \u2013 at least not when it comes to Best Actor, the &#8220;big one&#8221; the studios will obviously be pushing harder for.<\/p>\n<h6><!--more--><\/h6>\n<p>The decision goes down like this: Anchor Bay will be handling his campaign for Best Actor for his work in &#8216;Solitary Man&#8217;, while Fox will be leading the charge for him to pick up a tiny naked gold man for his work as Gordon Gekko in &#8216;Wall Street&#8217;. This makes waves for a couple of reasons. First, Douglas was clearly the main sell for &#8216;Money Never Sleeps&#8217;. He gets first billing, and all the advertising was centered around his slimy character&#8217;s return to the big screen. Secondly, the original &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/1222\/wallstreet.html\">Wall Street<\/a>&#8216; was the movie that Michael Douglas previous won a Best Actor Oscar for. To have him suddenly bumped down to a &#8220;lesser&#8221; category is certainly interesting.<\/p>\n<p>It does, however, make sense when you think about his character in the &#8216;Wall Street&#8217; sequel and how, after a swift introduction, he gets sidelined for much of the middle of the movie.<\/p>\n<p>In &#8216;Solitary Man,&#8217; the woefully underseen comedic drama from David Levien and Brian Koppelman, Douglas is in almost every scene. Playing a man who tries to regain some kind of responsibility late in his life, it&#8217;s a turn that is at times hilarious, at times really touching, and at other times profoundly sad. He&#8217;s one of those overgrown men who still think they&#8217;re movers and shakers even after the luster of power has long left. As a man regaining his humility and humanity, Douglas soars.<\/p>\n<p>But it still doesn&#8217;t matter.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll give you two reasons right off the bat: James Franco and Javier Bardem.<\/p>\n<p>James Franco, in his one-man-band performance in &#8216;127 Hours&#8217;, is an absolute knockout. It&#8217;s the kind of performance you&#8217;d probably think would be too show-offy and grandstanding. He&#8217;s playing, of course, an amateur mountaineer caught between a boulder and a canyon wall, for a good ninety minutes or so. But the performance is restrained and beautifully modulated. &#8216;127 Hours&#8217;, from the team that brought everyone the feel-good movie about third world poverty, &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/2179\/slumdogmillionaire.html \">Slumdog Millionaire<\/a>&#8216;, will be something that everyone \u2013 and I mean everyone \u2013 will see and enjoy and talk about.<\/p>\n<p>Then there&#8217;s Javier Bardem, who stars in a movie called &#8216;Biutiful&#8217; that opens in the last week of December. While praised at Cannes (and, indeed, Bardem picked up that festival&#8217;s Best Actor prize), the movie will be a harder sell for Academy members and general audiences. It has an almost relentlessly bleak outlook and sluggish pacing. Still, it&#8217;s an unbelievable performance, one that will probably (even given the film&#8217;s outsider status) garner a nomination for Bardem. Possibly even a win.<\/p>\n<p>As much as I&#8217;d like to think that Edgar Ramirez might be able to pick up a nomination for his turn as tortured terrorist Carlos &#8220;The Jackal&#8221; in Olivier Assayas&#8217; epic &#8216;Carlos&#8217;, I think that film will probably be the &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/2767\/che.html \">Che<\/a>&#8216; of this year. No matter how outstanding the performance, the movie is too long and the subject matter too prickly for most Academy members. From what I understand, both Colin Firth (for &#8216;The King&#8217;s Speech&#8217;) and Ryan Gosling (for &#8216;Blue Valentine&#8217;) are also considered front-runners. (When I see those films, I&#8217;ll report back.) There&#8217;s also Jesse Eisenberg for &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/social-network-review\/ \">The Social Network<\/a>&#8216;. However, I think the acting nominations for that film will mostly fall into the Supporting Actor category, with either Justin Timberlake or Arnie Hammer picking up noms.<\/p>\n<p>Who did I forget? And what do you think of this Michael Douglas decision? Sound off below!<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent &#8216;New York Times&#8217; article about Michael Douglas, his health troubles, and the dual Oscar campaigns of two of his films (the very good &#8216;Solitary Man&#8216; and the less-good-but-still-pretty-good &#8216;Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps&#8216;) left me puzzled and a little bit sad. As wonderful as his turns in both of those films are (in&#8230;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_excerpt -->","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":7847,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[132],"tags":[1479,1581,1582,550,1378,1461,1328],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7799"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7799"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8015,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7799\/revisions\/8015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}