{"id":54192,"date":"2013-08-05T08:00:26","date_gmt":"2013-08-05T15:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/?p=54192"},"modified":"2017-05-19T13:16:53","modified_gmt":"2017-05-19T20:16:53","slug":"boxoffice-aug-5-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/boxoffice-aug-5-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"Weekend Box Office: &#8216;Smurfs&#8217; Get Squashed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Have Americans (somewhat) come to their senses? Despite following up a $563 million worldwide winner, those little blue bastards got destroyed this weekend!<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Although &#8216;<strong>2 Guns<\/strong>&#8216; took the top spot at the box office, I&#8217;m surprised that it didn&#8217;t earn more. Director Baltasar Kormakur&#8217;s last movie, &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/6567\/contraband.html\">Contraband<\/a>&#8216;, also starred Mark Wahlberg and opened to $24.3 million. You&#8217;d think that number would increase significantly by adding Denzel Washington to the line-up. In February 2012, Washington&#8217;s &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/6690\/safe_house.html\">Safe House<\/a>&#8216; opened north of $40 million. However, &#8216;2 Guns&#8217; barely exceeded &#8216;Contraband&#8217;. On 3,025 screens, the film earned just $27.3 million. Although the movie isn&#8217;t bad, it poses the question: Is Denzel on his way out of the action genre?<\/p>\n<p>Even dropping a nasty 59% in attendance, &#8216;<strong>The Wolverine<\/strong>&#8216; still managed to grasp the #2 spot. Although its debut weekend was about on par with &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/4502\/xmenfirstclass.html\">X-Men: First Class<\/a>&#8216;, the second-week drop-off was a bit worse. If the runs are similar (which I doubt since &#8216;The Wolverine&#8217; will be booted from 3D screens quickly), it could very well finish its theatrical run around $146 million. At this point, the $120 million-budgeted film has earned $95 million.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<strong>The Smurfs 2<\/strong>&#8216; debuted in third place. On 3,866 screens, the $105 million sequel pulled in $18.2 million. The Wednesday head start gave it a five-day total of $27.7 million. While those numbers aren&#8217;t terrible (but pretty close), let me give you some perspective: &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/5796\/smurfs.html\">The Smurfs<\/a>&#8216; opened to $35.6 million in 2011. After five days, the original &#8216;Smurfs&#8217; was at $46.2 million. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hollywoodreporter.com\/news\/box-office-report-2-guns-599317\"><em>The Hollywood Reporter<\/em> notes<\/a> that the &#8216;Smurfs 2&#8242; debut is the worst of all the kids&#8217; movies crowding this overpopulated summer \u2013 even worse than &#8216;Turbo&#8217;. Given that the first movie earned $421 million of its $563 million worldwide haul from international showings, you&#8217;d expect the sequel to have killed it overseas \u2013 but it didn&#8217;t. Instead, Smurfs were defeated by &#8216;Pacific Rim&#8217; (in China, at least). All-in-all, &#8216;The Smurfs 2&#8217; has earned $52.5 million from international markets.<\/p>\n<p>The #4 spot went to &#8216;<strong>The Conjuring<\/strong>&#8216;. In its third weekend, the $20 million R-rated horror flick crossed the $100 million mark with a 38% drop-off and another $13.6 million. Also still going strong was fifth place &#8216;<strong>Despicable Me 2<\/strong>&#8216;. The five-weekend-old sequel continues to play strong despite two other 3D kids&#8217; movies that opened after it. The movie&#8217;s $10.3 million weekend has pushed it past $326 million domestically and $387 million internationally, for a total of $713.6 million?<\/p>\n<p>After major critical acclaim from the 2013 Sundance Film Festival, &#8216;<strong>The Spectacular Now<\/strong>&#8216; had great turnout in its debut weekend. Playing on four screens in L.A. and New York, it earned an impressive $200,000. Distributor A24 will follow the expansion model for Fox Searchlight&#8217;s &#8216;The Way, Way Back&#8217; and will slowly expand the release over the next few weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Lindsay Lohan&#8217;s &#8216;<strong>The Canyons<\/strong>&#8216; warranted a great single-screen opening, but a reportedly even better VOD release. Theatrically, it earned $15,200 from that lone screen. The VOD numbers haven&#8217;t been announced, but are said to be strong.<\/p>\n<p>Numbers have yet to be released for &#8216;<strong>Europa Report<\/strong>&#8216;.<\/p>\n<h5>Top 10:<\/h5>\n<p>1. &#8216;2 Guns&#8217; (Universal) &#8211; $27,361,000<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8216;The Wolverine&#8217; (Fox) &#8211; $21,725,000<\/p>\n<p>3. &#8216;The Smurfs 2&#8217; (Sony) &#8211; $18,200,000<\/p>\n<p>4. &#8216;The Conjuring&#8217; (Warner Bros.) &#8211; $13,660,000<\/p>\n<p>5. &#8216;Despicable Me 2&#8217; (Universal) &#8211; $10,391,000<\/p>\n<p>6. &#8216;Grown Ups 2&#8217; (Sony) &#8211; $8,100,000<\/p>\n<p>7. &#8216;Turbo&#8217; (Fox) &#8211; $6,400,000<\/p>\n<p>8. &#8216;RED 2&#8217; (Summit) &#8211; $5,650,000<\/p>\n<p>9. &#8216;The Heat&#8217; (Fox) &#8211; $4,725,000<\/p>\n<p>10. &#8216;Pacific Rim&#8217; (Warner Bros.) &#8211; $4,570,000<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Have Americans (somewhat) come to their senses? Despite following up a $563 million worldwide winner, those little blue bastards got destroyed this weekend!<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_excerpt -->","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":54451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[743],"tags":[6622,178,757,3241,5916,6637,6603,568],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54192"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54488,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54192\/revisions\/54488"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}