{"id":13385,"date":"2011-03-28T06:00:50","date_gmt":"2011-03-28T13:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/?p=13385"},"modified":"2017-08-04T12:12:48","modified_gmt":"2017-08-04T19:12:48","slug":"boxoffice-mar-28-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/boxoffice-mar-28-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Weekend Box Office: Hilariously, &#8216;Wimpy Kid&#8217; Clobbers &#8216;Sucker Punch&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes you just have to laugh when you see the box office receipts pouring in throughout the weekend. Initially, it seemed that the family film sequel &#8216;Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules&#8217; would take the top spot. Then on Saturday, Zack Snyder&#8217;s &#8220;edgy,&#8221; &#8220;sexy&#8221; (because these are words the studio uses to describe it) pop art fantasia &#8216;Sucker Punch&#8217; looked like it would edge out the wimpy kid. But, whoops, the box office seems to have way more twists and turns in store.<\/p>\n<h6><!--more--><\/h6>\n<p>That&#8217;s right, folks, &#8216;<strong>Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules<\/strong>&#8216;, released almost a year after the first &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/3511\/diaryofawimpykid.html\">Diary of a Wimpy Kid<\/a>&#8216;, won the box office derby with $24 million. I really don&#8217;t have much to say about this, so instead I&#8217;ll just clap dramatically at the computer screen. I haven&#8217;t seen the first film and have no interest in this one (despite the fact that it was made by one of the directors of underrated Aardman animated film &#8216;Flushed Away&#8217;), but I can appreciate that a scrappy little good-natured family flick could trump the endless cacophony of studio-orchestrated hype that is\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2026Zack Snyder&#8217;s impenetrable, Comic-Con engineered &#8216;<strong>Sucker Punch<\/strong>&#8216;. This is a movie that I could hardly sit through without rolling my eyes for the entire running time. God, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/sucker-punch-review\/\">I hated it<\/a>. Apparently, the American public wasn&#8217;t too keen on it either. The $100 million action movie starring girls in strappy underwear (but little sense of the tenants of feminism \u2013 including empowerment, strength, or self-worth) took in a mere $20 million for the second spot. This thing is going to drop like a fucking stone once word gets out from the general populace that it&#8217;s <em>&#8220;Like &#8216;Inception&#8217; mixed with &#8216;Moulin Rouge!&#8217;\u2026 or something.&#8221;<\/em> (Yes, in my mind, the everyday viewer is just as inarticulate as I am.) I&#8217;m so happy this thing bombed. There have been some flights-of-fancy floated online that the failure of &#8216;Sucker Punch&#8217; will make Warner Bros. fire Snyder from the forthcoming &#8216;Superman&#8217; film. That&#8217;s not likely to happen, unfortunately. But, as &#8216;Sucker Punch&#8217; teaches us, it&#8217;s good to dream.<\/p>\n<p>In the #3 and #4 positions were a pair of mid-level genre pictures that have held on surprisingly well, each dropping only 20%. At #3 with $15 million was Neil Burger&#8217;s &#8216;<strong>Limitless<\/strong>&#8216;. I saw this one over the weekend and sort of loved it. I say &#8220;sort of&#8221; because, at its heart, &#8216;Limitless&#8217; is pretty dumb, despite all its smarty-pants posturing. Bradley Cooper is oddly appealing as the loser writer (bully for me) who gets seduced by a scientific super-drug that lets him tap the untold resources of his brain. Burger directs the movie with a level of visual sophistication that you&#8217;d expect from someone like Michel Gondry, and the whole thing has an undeniably zippy, go-for-broke energy. Seriously, if you want to have a great, hands-in-the-air time at the theater, go see &#8216;Limitless&#8217;. It&#8217;s pretty great, especially if you overlook the skyscraper-sized plot holes (as I did).<\/p>\n<p>The #4 film was &#8216;<strong>The Lincoln Lawyer<\/strong>&#8216;, which looks pretty crummy but critics have seemed to enjoy (and audiences too). It made $10.5 million. I haven&#8217;t seen it yet. But my mom saw it last night, and she seemed to like it. So there&#8217;s that.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that &#8216;<strong>Rango<\/strong>&#8216;, coming in at #5 with another $10 million, has now eclipsed the $100 million mark. Meanwhile, &#8216;<strong>Mars Needs Moms<\/strong>&#8216; will enjoy its last weekend in the Top 10, at #10 with $2.5 million. That brings the $200 million-budgeted &#8216;Mars&#8217; total tally up to $18.5 million, which is about what it cost to make &#8216;Diary of a Wimpy Kid&#8217; and less than what that film made in its opening weekend. Woof.<\/p>\n<h5>The Top 10:<\/h5>\n<p>01 &#8216;Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules&#8217; (Fox) &#8211; $24 million<\/p>\n<p>02 &#8216;Sucker Punch&#8217; (Warner Bros) &#8211; $20 million<\/p>\n<p>03 &#8216;Limitless&#8217; (Relativity) &#8211; $15 million<\/p>\n<p>04 &#8216;The Lincoln Lawyer&#8217; (Lionsgate) &#8211; $10.5 million<\/p>\n<p>05 &#8216;Rango&#8217; (Paramount) &#8211; $10 million<\/p>\n<p>06 &#8216;Battle: Los Angeles&#8217; (Sony) &#8211; $7.8 million<\/p>\n<p>07 &#8216;Paul&#8217; (Universal) &#8211; $7.8 million<\/p>\n<p>08 &#8216;Red Riding Hood&#8217; (Warner Bros) &#8211; $4.5 million<\/p>\n<p>09 &#8216;The Adjustment Bureau&#8217; (Universal) &#8211; $4 million<\/p>\n<p>10 &#8216;Mars Needs Moms&#8217; (Disney) &#8211; $2.5<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes you just have to laugh when you see the box office receipts pouring in throughout the weekend. Initially, it seemed that the family film sequel &#8216;Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules&#8217; would take the top spot. Then on Saturday, Zack Snyder&#8217;s &#8220;edgy,&#8221; &#8220;sexy&#8221; (because these are words the studio uses to describe it)&#8230;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_excerpt -->","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13597,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[743],"tags":[178,2588,2281,2510,2420,2279,2527,1332],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13385"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13385"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":86408,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13385\/revisions\/86408"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}