{"id":10169,"date":"2011-01-06T08:00:52","date_gmt":"2011-01-06T16:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/?p=10169"},"modified":"2012-10-06T06:20:34","modified_gmt":"2012-10-06T13:20:34","slug":"scifi-movie-stupidity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/scifi-movie-stupidity\/","title":{"rendered":"It\u2019s Official: Sci-Fi Movies Are Dumb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I doubt that anyone will be too surprised to hear that science fiction movies are rarely scientifically accurate. It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to figure that out. Nonetheless, when actual rocket scientists weigh in on the issue, perhaps we should give their opinions some credence. If you&#8217;ve ever wondered which movies NASA thinks are the dumbest ever made, now&#8217;s your chance to find out. <\/p>\n<h6><!--more--><\/h6>\n<p>During a recent day-long private conference at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, NASA experts <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/news\/nation\/apocalyptic-blockbuster-absurd-say-nasa-scientists\/story-e6frg6nf-1225980644144\">pleaded with Hollywood to make science fiction movies less stupid<\/a>, and compiled a list of some of the biggest offenders. <\/p>\n<p>Big shock: &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/245\/armageddon.html\">Armageddon<\/a>&#8216; is high up there. You remember that one \u2013 the movie where the world&#8217;s greatest scientists determine that it would be easier to train a bunch of illiterate, wise-cracking oil drillers to pilot a space shuttle than it would be to train real astronauts how to drill a hole. Other dishonorable mentions include &#8216;The Core&#8217;, &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/515\/chainreaction.html\">Chain Reaction<\/a>&#8216;, and &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/1349\/6thday.html\">The 6th Day<\/a>&#8216;.<\/p>\n<p>So, what&#8217;s the dumbest movie ever made, according to NASA? That would be Roland Emmerich&#8217;s end-of-the-world disaster flick &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/2956\/2012_single.html\">2012<\/a>&#8216;. Personally, I think you could put just about any Roland Emmerich movie in this category.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also glad to see NASA call out the bullshit New Age &#8220;documentary&#8221; &#8216;What the Bleep Do We Know?&#8217; (the movie that would have us believe that water has feelings) as a huge load of pseudoscience bunk. <\/p>\n<p>With that said, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.adelaidenow.com.au\/news\/nasa-names-most-realistic-sci-fi-flicks-and-shames-the-most-ridiculous-ones\/story-fn7bfu22-1225980991650\">what movies does NASA like<\/a>? One of the most realistic sci-fi movies is also one of the earliest \u2013 Fritz Lang&#8217;s silent masterpiece &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/1597\/metropolis.html\">Metropolis<\/a>&#8216;. Also rated highly are &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/262\/contact.html\">Contact<\/a>&#8216; (a personal favorite), the original &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/1801\/dayearthstoodstill1951.html\">The Day the Earth Stood Still<\/a>&#8216;, and &#8216;Jurassic Park&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>Surprisingly, the movie that tops NASA&#8217;s list is &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/178\/gattaca.html\">Gattaca<\/a>&#8216;. I had a lot of problems with that film&#8217;s plausibility. I just don&#8217;t believe it would be feasible for the main character to totally eliminate any trace of hair, fiber, skin, and other DNA samples from everywhere he lives and works on a daily basis, among other issues. Nevertheless, NASA approves of its core scientific ideas. <\/p>\n<p>I find it shocking that &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/453\/2001aspaceodyssey.html\">2001: A Space Odyssey<\/a>&#8216; <em>didn&#8217;t<\/em> make the &#8220;best&#8221; list. Was that just an oversight? <\/p>\n<p>For more on this subject, see the <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org\/\">Science and Entertainment Exchange<\/a>, which has more interesting articles about the scientific accuracy of movies like &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/3341\/ironman2.html\">Tron: Legacy<\/a>&#8216; and &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/bluray.highdefdigest.com\/3341\/ironman2.html\">Iron Man 2<\/a>&#8216;.<\/p>\n<p><em>[via <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.moviefone.com\/2011\/01\/03\/nasa-names-most-realistic-and-unrealistic-sci-fi-films-of-all-ti\/\">Moviefone<\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I doubt that anyone will be too surprised to hear that science fiction movies are rarely scientifically accurate. It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to figure that out. Nonetheless, when actual rocket scientists weigh in on the issue, perhaps we should give their opinions some credence. If you&#8217;ve ever wondered which movies NASA thinks are&#8230;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_excerpt -->","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":10170,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[132],"tags":[1994,632,176,1995,266,420,628,1993,559,1058],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10169"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10169"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41877,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10169\/revisions\/41877"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.highdefdigest.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}